This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++] Patch c++/15049


Matt Austern wrote:

>   - We should conform as closely as possible to C++-03.  We shouldn't
> attempt to have C++98 and C++03 as separate modes.
>   - If an issue has status "WP" (not "Ready", which is a a lesser
> status), then in some cases we should consider incorporating it.  In
> some cases it should be unconditional (if it's strictly upward
> compatible with C++03 and if it's important), otherwise it should be
> conditionalized by a flag or macro.

I agree: we should implement everything with TC1 status (see also g++.dg/tc1/*
which I contributed, which has xfails for things yet to be implemented), while
WP defects should probably be activated with a new option like -std=c++0x.

Giovanni Bajo



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]