This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] gcc/*.[ch]: Fix comment typos.


On Friday, September 10, 2004, at 02:29 PM, Kazu Hirata wrote:
Instead of saying the same thing, may I ask if there is an official
process to resolve this kind of conflict?

I think we can appeal to the RM, this is his job. I don't think it is important enough to appeal the RM, if you don't like what he says, but, the next step would be the SC.


Mark? This only applies to safe cleanups of the style Kazu usually does in stage3 and specifically for Kazu... not a wholesale opening to others or for other types of changes.

My rational is, our product _is_ the source code. And, that product is better when these cleanups are done. I think Kazu's track record and style speaks for itself. I support what he does and how he does it.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]