This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Omit frame pointer and fix %ebp by default on x86 (take3)


On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Well, missing some stack frames is, from the Java point of view,
> failing.  We need stack traces for correct functioning.
>
> We will work around this in Java by using unwinder info to do a
> backtrace, but we don't yet do so.  Please do not check in this patch.

If this were the case, wouldn't you expect to see at least one new
failure somewhere in GCC's libjava testsuite?  I'll try running
JACKS as well, but either there's a significant hole in gcj's
regression testing or things aren't half as bad as you make out.

Roger
--


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]