This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at fastmail dot fm>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:58:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var
References: <20040816131921.GA9646@fastmail.fm> <1092664117.24081.97.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Aug 16, 2004, at 9:48 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:

On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 09:19, Nathanael Nerode wrote:

The motivation here is that we're going to have to change the semantics of is_gimple_tmp_var and possibly break it into two or more separate functions. Getting rid of totally spurious uses simplifies this process.
I guess I'm missing something.  Though what you describe sounds
reasonable, what's wrong with is_gimple_tmp_var as it exists today?


It's abusing DECL_ARTIFICIAL.
:)
You must have killed that thread or something.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: [PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]