This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Add tgmath.h
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk> writes:
| On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > I believe this is a key ppint we ought to decide on as a general policy.
| > Not only <complex.h>, but any other headers that the target might
| > lack. (<fenv.h> anyone?)
|
| As those headers declare functions there's not much use in adding them
| when the functions aren't in the library. (Note how little goes in the
It has also been my understanding that if we elect to provide a
header, we would not just provide declarations, but also the
corresponding definitions, too. Otherwise, the whole thing is
pointless. This is why it is different from fixinclude trickery.
| headers fixproto can add.) The question is about <tgmath.h> when some but
| not all of the functions it needs are present, so maybe some macros would
| work but not others.
I believe it is pointless to provide a <tgmath.h> if it is going to fail.
-- Gaby