This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 predicates

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:37:46 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 predicates
References: <200408131444.i7DEifD33888@makai.watson.ibm.com> <87r7qbkkvd.fsf@codesourcery.com> <200408131732.i7DHWgD33450@makai.watson.ibm.com> <87ekmbkklz.fsf@codesourcery.com>

>>>>> Zack Weinberg writes:

>> What case are you worried about?  The *_operation predicates not
>> explicitly testing for PARALLEL?  any_operand no longer including
>> PARALLEL?

Zack> Both.  Well, *_operation will probably abort if handed a non-PARALLEL,
Zack> so it's less of an issue.

	lmw_operation, stmw_operation, mfcr_operation, mtcrf_operation
only will be presented with PARALLEL.

	any_operand no longer will be presented a PARALLEL.

David

References:
- [PATCH, committed] rs6000 predicates
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 predicates
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 predicates
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 predicates
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]