Re: PATCH: First part of 64-bit Darwin support

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:17:13PM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> OK, not as obvious as I thought. I'll do this as a separate patch; it 
> only came up in one place in BLAST, where an array of shorts was being
> incorrectly aligned on 2-byte boundary.

Or, more likely, correctly aligned on a 2 byte boundary, and 
some code elsewhere was incorrectly assuming larger alignment.

They *are* shorts, after all...



r~