This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Lower VLA representation to pointers
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:25:13PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> In standard terms there is no new block, neither after the label (which
> indeed could be in a nested block) nor before the VLA, and the scope is
> the same (same scope being defined as scope ending at same point) as that
> of other declarations in the block.
Huh. Perhaps I was confusing with C++, or just confused.
Anyway, testing a patch that adds an artifical BIND_EXPR,
but not a lexical scope.
r~