This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Lower VLA representation to pointers


On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:25:13PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> In standard terms there is no new block, neither after the label (which 
> indeed could be in a nested block) nor before the VLA, and the scope is 
> the same (same scope being defined as scope ending at same point) as that 
> of other declarations in the block.

Huh.  Perhaps I was confusing with C++, or just confused.
Anyway, testing a patch that adds an artifical BIND_EXPR,
but not a lexical scope.



r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]