This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 LABEL_REF rtx_cost

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:30:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 LABEL_REF rtx_cost
References: <200408042341.i74Nf7D29848@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20040804235224.GA757@redhat.com>

>>>>> Richard Henderson writes:

Richard> Hmm?  We also load addresses of LABEL_REFs.

	Yes.  The 0 is better as the first order answer to be refined and
should fix the regressions while the costs are tweaked.

David

References:
- [PATCH, committed] rs6000 LABEL_REF rtx_cost
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH, committed] rs6000 LABEL_REF rtx_cost
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]