This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3] LSB symbols for 3.3
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, anderson at netsweng dot com
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:01:45 -0500 (CDT)
- Subject: Re: [v3] LSB symbols for 3.3
- References: <20040727003527.1a630cd5.bkoz@redhat.com>
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
| Although at this point I'm completely opposed to the C++ parts in the
| draft LSB 2.0 spec, this addition makes sense. It also allows cxxabichk,
| the LSB test tool, to get a bit further.
|
| I now get:
|
| No RTTI name for _ZTINSt8valarrayIjEE
| Checking class _ZNSaIcEE
| No RTTI name for _ZTINSaIcEE
| Checking class _ZNSaIwEE
| No RTTI name for _ZTINSaIwEE
| Checking class _ZNSt12__basic_fileIcEE
| No RTTI name for _ZTINSt12__basic_fileIcEE
| Checking class _ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EEE
| No RTTI name for _ZTINSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EEE
| Checking class _ZNSt6gsliceE
| No RTTI name for _ZTINSt6gsliceE
|
| All of which can be safely ignored. For some reason, inline destructors
| are causing problems with false errors in the test tool.
|
| tested x86/linux
Many thanks for producing this! If LSB people agrees on this and
it matches GCC-3.4.x and mainline, it is OK.
-- Gaby