This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Request for testing on fold-const.c patch
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, rth at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:00:34 -0600
- Subject: Re: Request for testing on fold-const.c patch
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc
- References: <10407262226.AA17191@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20040726225500.GA17713@disaster.jaj.com>
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:55, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > I find the former *much* cleared because it puts everything related together
> > in one place while the latter distributes it over many lines.
>
> The latter is far, far easier to step through in gdb.
Yup. And with a short comment, I find the latter style
(separate statements) much easier to read.
jeff