This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at codesourcery dot com
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:14:22 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200407120143.i6C1hVX9031744@sirius.codesourcery.com> <0dae01c467b5$edb1cad0$a54a2597@bagio> <40F1F51F.6000106@codesourcery.com> <0ddf01c467bc$864c33b0$a54a2597@bagio> <40F20FB5.8090000@codesourcery.com> <0e2701c467f5$96ae72c0$a54a2597@bagio>

Giovanni Bajo wrote:

Mark Mitchell wrote:

Does this look ok? Testing in progress on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Yes, it looks good. Thank you!

The testing was succesful, and it uncovered g++.old-deja/g++.ns/new1.C, which is illegal code. In fact, it's top description is: "Test whether N::operator new is different from ::operator new". Since the test is totally bogus at this point, I'll remove it unless anybody objects.

Yes, that's a bogus test, and should be removed.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com

References:
- PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: Avoid push_to_top_level
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]