This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Commence binfo extraction

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:39:35 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Commence binfo extraction
Organization: Codesourcery LLC
References: <40E3D4B7.3080905@codesourcery.com> <16611.55771.10389.110117@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <40E505A7.4050307@gmail.com>

Ranjit Mathew wrote:

Anything that simplifies BINFOs is quite welcome by me - I've
never understood them completely or why we need so many of them
for a given inheritance hierarchy. In any case, I trust that
you'd be updating the relevant documentation pieces also:

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Classes.html

thanks for reminding me.  I think I'll stick a little <under
reconstruction> note there for the moment.

If Andrew is referring to the recent EH regressions in Java,
then rth's patch seems to have solved them on
i686-pc-linux-gnu at least.

good, now if someone can approve the non-java bits ...

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Commence binfo extraction
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [PATCH]: Commence binfo extraction
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- [PATCH]: Commence binfo extraction
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [PATCH]: Commence binfo extraction
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]