This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [rfa] libiberty: splay tree performance improvement
> Well, the canonical method is to not have the declarations of these
> structs within the public header at all, just to use opaque pointers
> within the API, which by the way the code looks quite ready for.
We still want to be able to access fields within the structure
directly, just not be able to do anything that needs the size of the
structure.
> With the GDB nonuse news, is the patch ok to commit (with the struct
> field additions moved to the bottom as requested)?
Did you check gcc to make sure it always does the right thing?