This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch applied to mainline (Was: patch applied tosh-elf-3_5-branch: fix up more movas, use PIC-safe fixups for PIC.)

From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: joern dot rennecke at superh dot com
Cc: mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:17:13 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: patch applied to mainline (Was: patch applied tosh-elf-3_5-branch: fix up more movas, use PIC-safe fixups for PIC.)
References: <200406081712.i58HCUZ28728@linsvr1.uk.superh.com><200406101816.i5AIGAN17298@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>

Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com> wrote:
>> 2004-05-27  J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
>> 
>> 	* sh.c (dump_table): New argument start.  Changed caller.
>> 	(fixup_mova): New function.
>> 	(find_barrier): Use it.
>> 	(sh_reorg): Likewise.  Check for CODE_FOR_casesi_worker_2.
>> 	If the label a mova refers to is above the mova itself, change
>> 	the mova into a load.
>> 	* sh.md (*casesi_worker): Rename to:
>> 	(casesi_worker_1).
>> 	(casesi_worker_2): New insn.
> 
> I've applied this patch to mainline now.

This fixes PR target/15396 on the 3.4-branch.  It's better to backport
this patch to the 3.4-branch with Mark's approval, isn't it?

Regards,
	kaz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: patch applied to mainline (Was: patch applied to
  - From: Joern Rennecke

References:
- patch applied to sh-elf-3_5-branch: fix up more movas, use PIC-safe fixups for PIC.
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- patch applied to mainline (Was: patch applied to sh-elf-3_5-branch: fix up more movas, use PIC-safe fixups for PIC.)
  - From: Joern Rennecke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]