This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Index add_cost/neg_cost by machine mode in expmed.c
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 21:51:47 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Index add_cost/neg_cost by machine mode in expmed.c
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Roger Sayle wrote:
> for (mode = GET_CLASS_NARROWEST_MODE (MODE_INT);
> mode != VOIDmode;
> mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode))
> {
> reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, 10000);
> + add_cost[(int) mode] = rtx_cost (gen_rtx_PLUS (mode, reg, reg), SET);
> + neg_cost[(int) mode] = rtx_cost (gen_rtx_NEG (word_mode, reg), SET);
^^^^^^^^^
> div_cost[(int) mode] = rtx_cost (gen_rtx_UDIV (mode, reg, reg), SET);
> mul_cost[(int) mode] = rtx_cost (gen_rtx_MULT (mode, reg, reg), SET);
Doh! A mindless typo. I've fixed this in my local sources, and am
rebootstrapping/regression testing with the "obvious" correction.
Roger
--