This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [m68k] gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints)


>On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:13:23AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>> >	* config/m68k/m68k.h: disallow bytes in address registers.
>> >	* config/m68k/m68k.c: Likewise.
>
>This seems reasonable.   I doubt you get much benefit from holding
>bytes in address registers to begin with.
>
>> > add peephole2
>> >          to use a data register to hold the constant for the add if
>> >          one is available. 
>
>First, this is an unrelated change, so it should have been
>submitted separately.  Second, don't you want to *only* perform
>this peephole for immediates outside -8 ... 8, i.e. those that
>can be handled by addq.l directly?

I'll rework this part of the patch and submit seperately.

-- 
Peter Barada
peter@the-baradas.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]