This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:12:29 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
References: <021801c4423c$dc3888a0$444e2a97@bagio> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405251051060.5639@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <080801c44390$296df480$444e2a97@bagio> <20040527100403.GV4736@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:

I'm fairly certain GLIBC 2.3.4 will be out long time before GCC 3.5 (or 4.0?).

Out of curiosity, what about 2.3.3, in the meanwhile?

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]