This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] PATCH arith.c, another range checking problem

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 13:12:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran] PATCH arith.c, another range checking problem
References: <20040518020357.GA41111@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:

This range checking problem is probably a benign bug, but I
thought we should fix it away.  The fix is obvious.

I applied this as obvious.

I'm wondering if this can ever trigger. Is there a combination of integer and real kinds where an integer can overflow a real? Or is there something else which could happen? Nevertheless, having the correct check in place seems more appropriate.

- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran] PATCH arith.c, another range checking problem
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- [gfortran] PATCH arith.c, another range checking problem
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]