This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Paul Eggert <RAW-EMAIL-REDACTED>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: dk at artimi dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:22:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: [Paul Eggert <RAW-EMAIL-REDACTED>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
- References: <NUTMEGJ3Ih7jtrSByh100000051@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
> Erm, PMFBI, but if bfd has *any* non-K&R files, doesn't that imply
> that it *does* require a C90 compiler, and therefore that there's no
> reason *not* to require the same for libiberty after all?
There's a subtle difference between "requires a C90 compiler" and "has
been converted to require a C90 compiler".
But in essense you're right.