This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [m68k] Use ColdFire V4 mov3q instruction to store constants tomemory
Peter Barada wrote:
+ else if (TARGET_CFV4 && (GET_MODE (operands[0]) == SImode)
+ && valid_mov3q_const (operands[1]))
+ return "move3q%.l %1,%0";
This move3q is spelled differently...
It should be mov3q.
I've saved all the patches you've submitted and will
shortly apply them to 3.4-branch for regression testing.
My test box is currently executing the test suite
on the unpatched version of GCC.
To save time, I'll test once with all patches
applied, so in the lucky case we get 0 new
regressions it will be reasonably safe to assume
each of them is good.
NOTE: let's use [m68k] instead of [PATCH] for these
patches. Most people don't read all messages in
gcc-patches (I certainly don't) and look these tags
to quickly spot patches in their interest areas.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/