Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05)

[Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>]

Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:06:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
> > Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> > > 
> > > >please can we update the libstdc++ baseline files before the release?
> > > 
> > > We'll do this after 3.4.0.
> > > 
> > > In particular, the linux distributors need to figure out if we are going
> > > to mandate --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt as a linux-specific
> > > configuration option, as we do with __cxa_atexit.
> > 
> > in contrast to the documentation of __cxa_atexit, the "documentation"
> > of --enable-libstdcxx-allocator is not much. the link to
> > http://sources.redhat.com/glibc/ looks generic, but not that useful.
> 
> If you're referring to the link at the bottom of configopts.html I think
> that was a copy'n'paste error and something like the attached patch should
> be applied.  (I've slightly changed the text to read better when offline.)
> 
> jon
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on."
> 	- Dean Martin
> Index: docs/html/configopts.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/configopts.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.34
> diff -u -p -b -B -r1.34 configopts.html
> --- docs/html/configopts.html	13 Mar 2004 06:54:23 -0000	1.34
> +++ docs/html/configopts.html	20 Apr 2004 07:56:27 -0000
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ options</a></h1>
>   <dd><p>Select a target-specific underlying std::allocator.  The
>          choices are 'new' to specify a wrapper for new, 'malloc' to
>          specify a wrapper for malloc, 'mt' for a fixed power of two allocator
> -        (More <a href="http://sources.redhat.com/glibc/";>info</a>) or
> +        (<a href="ext/mt_allocator.html">documented</a> under extensions) or
>          'bitmap' for a bitmap allocator. This option can change the
>          library ABI.
>       </p>

committed as obvious to 3.4 and HEAD.

	Matthias