This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH: Fix C99ism in init.c

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:05:09 +0200
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: Fix C99ism in init.c
References: <200404230107.i3N17xF7020215@sirius.codesourcery.com> <4088D1E2.6050803@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404230951290.32274@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Surely the bootstrap
failure was *because* the warning option was already present (along with
-Werror), as opposed to someone building a cross-compiler with 2.95?

You must be right, but then I do not understand how it could have slipped by Mark (unless he used new-bootstrap, which compiles C only for stage1, but it seems unlikely).

Paolo

References:
- C++ PATCH: Fix C99ism in init.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Fix C99ism in init.c
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: C++ PATCH: Fix C99ism in init.c
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]