This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Two-part patch for hppa64-hpux libstdc++ testsuite failures
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mitchell at codesourcery dot com>,John David Anglin <dave at hiauly2 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:46:01 -0700
- Subject: Re: Two-part patch for hppa64-hpux libstdc++ testsuite failures
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <87oepvxsum.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
This doesn't happen on the mainline; the relevant change is one small
piece of a very large patch by Matt Austern which was applied to the
mainline on March 12. So the gcc part of this patch extracts that fix
and backports it to the branch.
How nice.
The net result in the libstdc++ testsuite for PA64:
-FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/inserters_extractors/pod/10081-in.cc
-FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/inserters_extractors/pod/10081-out.cc
-FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/1.cc
-FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/2.cc
-FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/sentry/pod/1.cc
-FAIL: 27_io/basic_ostream/sentry/pod/1.cc
Bootstrapped i686-linux and hppa64-hpux11.11. OK 3.4 branch? The
libstdc++ tweaks should go on mainline too. (N.B. We can't use := for
the Makefile variables that expand to $(shell ...) constructs because
then they get run too early.)
Yes, this is OK for 3.4, and the testsuite changes are OK for mainline.
However, I'd be happy to hear to comments from Benjamin or other V3
experts. So, please go ahead and check this in, but be prepared to make
changes if the V3 folks think the testsuite change isn't quite right for
some reason.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com