This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: paul at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:00:07 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200404052346.40750.paul@codesourcery.com> <200404091226.i39CQ8ug010701@caip.rutgers.edu>

Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:

> 2004-04-05 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> > > PR2123 > * g++.gd/expr/anew1.C: XFAIL and make reproducible. Call abort on > failuse and exit(0) on success. > * g++.gd/expr/anew2.C: Ditto. > * g++.gd/expr/anew3.C: Ditto. > * g++.gd/expr/anew4.C: Ditto.

Paul - There's a typo, you should change .gd -> .dg
Also would you please consider backporting this to 3.4.1 since the
testcases are there too?

Yes, this is fine for 3.4.1. In fact, it's fine for 3.4.0 if it gets done quickly; removing spurious FAILs is a good thing for users downloading the 3.4.0 release.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

References:
- [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]