This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: committed: Ada updates

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: dnovillo at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 04 11:28:46 EDT
Subject: Re: committed: Ada updates

    We will need to emit GENERIC first.  That's the part that removes the
    semantics of the input language.  Once we are emitting GENERIC trees out
    of the Ada FE, it should all "just work".

Right.  My question, then, is how close are the nodes that I cited to those
that are in GENERIC.  Is it just a matter of namings of nodes and fields
or something more substantive?

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]