This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Enable regrename and web if debug information is not ruined


> This doesn't look good to me. We don't want the presence or absence
> of -g to affect code generation.

I understand, but I wanted these options to be enabled/disabled depending on
whether they affect debuggability.  If -g is absent, debuggability cannot get
worse.  The criterion I picked (explained in the subject) is arguably as bad
as gcc 3.x producing code that is tout court undebuggable at -O3 because it
includes -frename-registers.

Paolo



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]