This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Enhance statement checking & fix minor buglets



On Apr 5, 2004, at 6:42 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:


On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:12:46PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
Well, one thing that occurred to me would be to re-associate these
expressions to be PLUS_EXPR<SSA_NAME,MINUS_EXPR>. That would be a valid
gimple expression if MINUS_EXPR is_gimple_min_invariant. Though that
strikes me as somewhat hackish.

True, but it might be good enough. I'm working on it.

This would then be the only binary expression that allowed a binary expression as one of it's operands, which would seriously defeat the purpose of GIMPLE.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]