This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 17 Mar 2004 12:15:49 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
References: <200403171431.i2HEVAQA006002@speedy.slc.redhat.com><m3y8pzpjlt.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0403171543460.10297@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><m3u10no290.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0403171646170.31721@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk> writes:

> This feels to me almost like a case where the only
> reasonable figures (for number of releases with deprecation) are 0, 1 and
> infinity, and we've generally used 1.

I suppose that this is our basic disagreement.  I feel that there are
other reasonable figures.

Ian

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]