This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch ping (1 middle-end, 1 C front-end)


On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:02:56AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > One issue I do have is with:
> >
> >    (The second suggestion was to use vector modes only if they are really
> >    supported by the target, and use a similarly-sized vector type
> >    otherwise; this is quite complex, probably more than these two items I 
> >    implemented).
> >
> > If you only define vector modes for supported targets, how will a
> > SIMD-less target use generic vectors?
> 
> Well, that's not in this patch, but I believe that if people think
> about it properly, it will turn out that the plain old integer modes
> suffice.

I thought the idea with generic vectors was to make libstdc++ vector
code more portable.  And to aid in the auto-vectorization work, but
clearly that's not the case.

If Richard thinks generic vectors should go away, then I guess it's
ok. The patch then, should remove such code.

Aldy


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]