This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 11706 vs ([lno] Canonical iv creation)
Paolo Carlini wrote:
Why not removing it, the version taking integer arguments (and
__pow_helper), and adding the above instead?
... well, however there is libstdc++/3181, and we don't want to regress
on that, therefore, probably, we must keep 'pow(double __x, int __i)'
and so on, but I don't see what's wrong with using __builtin_pow in the
Notice that the very same thing (integer overload using __builtin_* in
the implementation) is /already/ happening for sin, cos, tan, and so on!!!!