This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
Cc: ian at wasabisystems dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:45:44 -0800
Subject: Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
References: <m37jy1447h.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <jmeks957u5.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <m3vflky2jo.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <200403042059.i24Kxc8P013767@desire.geoffk.org> <20040304234711.GC9269@redhat.com> <jmad2w5cey.fsf@desire.geoffk.org>

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:07:49PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> So, this raises the question: has anyone actually tried the approach
> that host-darwin uses on x86?  What happened?

It looks like it'll work.  Another possibility might be using brk.

I'm going to talk to some of the kernel folk here at redhat that
implemented this randomization thing in the first place -- we do
in fact have a vested interest in PCH working on our products.  ;-)

r~

References:
- Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize
  - From: Geoff Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]