This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Fix 13875


In message <20040302000630.GA26165@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson writes:
 >On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:50:17AM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >>   		      fold (build (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, base,
 >> ! 				   convert (TREE_TYPE (base),
 >> ! 					    integer_zero_node))),
 >
 >This is boolean_false_node.
I know.  But if you look at fold-const.c it actually never uses them
directly.  I guess I could use constant_boolean_node to get the
appropriate type.  I've been working under the assumption that there's
a good reason not to use those nodes directly.

Thoughts?
jeff



 >
 >
 >r~
 >



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]