This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix alignment bug

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at act-europe dot fr>
Cc: "John David Anglin" <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 29 Feb 2004 17:37:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix alignment bug
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <200402291543.i1TFh0DG016232@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca><200402291730.21552.ebotcazou@act-europe.fr>

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@act-europe.fr> writes:

| > It's PR 12761.  It was closed as WONTFIX ;(
| 
| Thanks.  I'm not sure it is related though, since it appears to be 
| connected to arrays, not records.
| 
| FYI, I recently fixed another long-standing alignment problem on SPARC
| 
| 2003-12-01  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
| 
| 	PR middle-end/7847
| 	* expr.c (expand_expr) [normal_inner_ref]: When 'offset' is non-zero,
| 	do not recheck that 'op0' is a MEM.  Move comment.  When testing for
| 	unaligned objects, take also into account the alignment of 'op0' and
| 	'mode1' if 'op0' is a MEM.
| 
| so you might want to try it too.

Would it be appropriate for gcc-3_3-branch?

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix alignment bug
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix alignment bug
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: [PATCH] Fix alignment bug
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]