This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Enable warnings for libbanshee

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: aj at suse dot de,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:31:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Enable warnings for libbanshee
References: <m3ptbyutdd.fsf@gromit.moeb> <m3llmmut45.fsf@gromit.moeb> <200402291418.i1TEIh94028922@caip.rutgers.edu>

On Feb 29, 2004, at 9:18 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:

Looking closer at the warnings, we should use IMO (As we do in GCC and
not as we do in libiberty):

  ac_libbanshee_warn_cflags='-W -Wall -pedantic -Wwrite-strings
  -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

Is libbanshee only ever compiled with the target GCC?

No.

 If so, then you
don't need -pedantic.  We should only use -pedantic on code that may
be built with another ISO C compiler.

References:
- [tree-ssa] Enable warnings for libbanshee
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [tree-ssa] Enable warnings for libbanshee
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [tree-ssa] Enable warnings for libbanshee
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]