This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Generic NRV optimization [was Re: two-elementstruct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) ]


On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 09:07, Diego Novillo wrote:

> #1  0x00000000005d0589 in change_address_1 (memref=0x2a9779fb30, mode=SImode,
>     addr=0x2a97db3720, validate=1)
>     at /home/cygnus/dnovillo/perf/sbox/tree-ssa-branch/local.x86_64/src/gcc/emit-rtl.c:1770
> 1770        abort ();
> (gdb) list 1770
> 1765    change_address_1 (rtx memref, enum machine_mode mode, rtx addr, int validate)
> 1766    {
> 1767      rtx new;
> 1768
> 1769      if (GET_CODE (memref) != MEM)
> 1770        abort ();
> 1771      if (mode == VOIDmode)
> 1772        mode = GET_MODE (memref);
> 1773      if (addr == 0)
> 1774        addr = XEXP (memref, 0);
> (gdb) p memref
> $1 = 0x2a9779fb30
> (gdb) pr
> (parallel:BLK [
>         (expr_list (reg:SI 58 [ val ])
>             (const_int 0 [0x0]))
>         (expr_list (reg:DI 59 [ val+8 ])
>             (const_int 8 [0x8]))
>     ])
> 
Well, we could move the RTL expanding logic from expand_return() but I'm
not sure this the real fix.  This will fail on every host that has a
parallel:BLK in DECL_RTL of RESULT_DECL.

We don't seem to know how to handle this type of DECL_RTL when expanding
assignments.

Does moving the expand logic from expand_return() look like the thing to
do here?


Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]