This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [lno] Introduce data dependence graph

From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:20:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [lno] Introduce data dependence graph
References: <0956C97C-5EAA-11D8-8DDB-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <F8B8E7B4-5EAB-11D8-8439-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org>

On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:

Is there some good reason you aren't using an alloc pool for the fixed size dependence_node_def and dependence_edge structures? It would get rid of a lot of GTY'ing, and a lot of ggc_allocing.

No particular reason. In my next patch I'll include alloc pool use.

--
Devang

References:
- [lno] Introduce data dependence graph
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [lno] Introduce data dependence graph
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]