This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH: PR 13714
- From: "Paolo Bonzini" <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- To: <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,<bernie at develer dot com>,<gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:17:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: PR 13714
> | > ! error ("the type being destroyed is '%T', but the destructor
refers to `%T'",
> | ^^^^
> | Shouldn't we use a backtick before the first %T?
>
> No. We've discussed this in the past. As I recalled it, the
> conclusion was moving toward the form he used.
> (something that would be better is a marker that could be suitable for
> translation).
The correct way is to use a backtick, and then use the en_US@quot,
en_US@boldquot or whatever else locales if the user wants to replace them.
And anyway the second %T does have a backtick. :-)
Paolo