This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 1 GCC gcc-3_4-branch regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2004-01-28T02:13:17Z.
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- To: geoffk at geoffk dot org
- Cc: aph at redhat dot com, bob dot wilson at acm dot org, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ian at wasabisystems dot com, jakub at redhat dot com, jlquinn at optonline dot net, joern dot rennecke at superh dot com, kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org, pcarlini at suse dot de, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, roger at eyesopen dot com, rsandifo at redhat dot com, uweigand at de dot ibm dot com
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:05:56 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: 1 GCC gcc-3_4-branch regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2004-01-28T02:13:17Z.
- References: <200401290755.i0T7tMBH029166@gcc-regress-3.apple.com> <200401291400.i0TE03wH025962@caip.rutgers.edu> <jm3c9yjwzc.fsf@desire.geoffk.org>
> From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
>
> "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
>
> > > From: "GCC regression checker" <geoffk@apple.com>
> > >
> > > With your recent patch, GCC gcc-3_4-branch has some regression test failures,
> > > which used to pass. There are 1 new failures, and 0
> > > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > > have been fixed.
> > >
> > > The new failures are:
> > > native objc.sum objc.dg/call-super-2.m
> >
> > Geoff, according to the logfile, this is failing because size_t isn't
> > declared. However it works for me on solaris2.7 and irix6.5. The
> > testfile includes objc.h which includes stddef.h and Object.h which
> > includes stdio.h via typedstream.h, so there are two ways we should be
> > getting size_t. The other testfile which uses size_t (desig-init-1.m)
> > includes stdio.h directly and that appears to work on your tester.
> >
> > Would you check what's up with your headers?
>
> My objc.h doesn't include stddef.h, and my Object.h doesn't include
> typedstream.h, probably because I'm not using GNU objc. I'll commit
> this patch to fix it:
Eh, what do you mean "my objc.h"? Shouldn't the objc testsuite be
checking objc with headers as supplied in the gcc cvs tree? Why would
it matter what custom non-FSF objc headers you have elsewhere on your
system?
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu