This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix libffi failures on SPARC

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr, Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
Date: 29 Jan 2004 11:10:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Fix libffi failures on SPARC
References: <200401241938.21694.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr><874qul14xi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <40172864.3020703@specifixinc.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com> writes:

>> I believe our general rule is that a port maintainer is free to
>> approve changes to the corresponding libffi port.

Jim> Except that there are copyright assignment issues, because libffi is
Jim> technically not part of gcc, and there is an attempt to make it
Jim> so. Does Eric Botcazou need to sign something now that he has added a
Jim> major libffi patch?

Good point, he may.  Anthony would know for certain; I've CCd him.
Eric, sorry about this, I completely forgot to mention it.

Tom

References:
- Fix libffi failures on SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Fix libffi failures on SPARC
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Fix libffi failures on SPARC
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]