This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] fix opt/13798


On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:03:38PM +0100, S. Bosscher wrote:
> > ! /* Create a new temporary name with PREFIX.  Returns an indentifier.  */
> >   
> > ! static GTY(()) unsigned int tmp_var_id_num;
> > ! 
> > ! static tree
> 
> Why the GTY for this variable?  The only reason I can think of, is
> that it needs to be there for PCH, but I thought we were supposed
> to be done compiling headers before anythink is gimplified???

Oh yes.  I forgot to mention this.

It's something I noticed when debugging PCH vs non-PCH compiles.
It really does make a difference in the numbers assigned between
the two.  I would guess that we're gimplifying too early in a lot
of cases.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]