Re: [C++ PATCH] Make parser revert digraph "<:"

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| > And the issue is which definition is most common, not which we can
| > choose to make an obscure message somehow meaningful.  I rather fix
| > the obscure message.
| > | Words are ambiguous.  There are usually many possible
| > interpretations, only
| > | some of which make sense in context.  In this case, there is only one
| > | interpretation which makes sense in context, so that's the one I choose to
| > | use.  Clinging to an interpretation which doesn't make sense, and then
| > | complaining about it not making sense, seems perverse to me.
| > That may be perverse, but that is NOT what is happenning here.
| 
| I'm again astonished at the amount of time you're willing to spend on
| topics that seem to me to be extremely unimportant. :-)

It takes too to tango <g>

-- Gaby