This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra?


Hi,

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Dara Hazeghi wrote:

> Also, because bugs reported against -fnew-ra on 3.4-branch are not
> necessarily still present against new-regalloc branch, I've suspended
> them until such a time as they are verified on the new-regalloc branch,

What exactly does the state "suspended" mean for bugs in bugzilla?  Can I 
still comment on them and mark them as fixed?

> or new-regalloc is merged back to mainline.
> 
> Does the attached patch look reasonable for mainline/3.4? Thanks,

> -for testing, so we are interested to hear about miscompilations with
> -@option{-fnew-ra}.
> +only for testing. Users should not specify this option, since it is not

Two spaces between sentences.

> +yet ready for production use.

Otherwise I have no objection to the patch.  The wording should have been 
similar to this from the beginning.


Ciao,
Michael.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]