This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ggc_free

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:22:22 -0800
Subject: Re: ggc_free
References: <20040123004947.GA23455@redhat.com> <20040123010312.GR25810@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040123011951.GA23682@redhat.com> <20040123013132.GA13170@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040123015543.GA23889@redhat.com> <20040123015917.GG13170@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:59:17AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> It seems to me that they point to dead instructions only after combine
> when no one is using them anymore.  Before combine they all should be
> valid right?

The bits I recall seeing are in sh_reorg.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ggc_free
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- ggc_free
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ggc_free
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: ggc_free
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ggc_free
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: ggc_free
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ggc_free
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]