This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
On 22-jan-04, at 7:51, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Segher Boessenkool <email@example.com> writes:
On 16-jan-04, at 22:32, Jan Hubicka wrote:
in the recent few day I made quite serious testing of the inlining.
As an aside, I noticed powerpc64-linux glibc does not compile with TOT
GCC, because the param max-inline-insns is gone. Would it make sense
for this parameter to alias to one (or more) of the
parameters, for compatibility (maybe with a warning)?
This should be fixed inside glibc in a portable way, there're better
ways for this (using attributes etc),
Sure, no question about that, glibc is just how I found out about this,
I'm not proposing to change the compiler for just one library on one
Would only emitting a warning telling to use one of the new params be
This might technically count as a regression against 3.3 ;-)