This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:40:13 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
- References: <10401170324.AA15949@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1074309907.3147.139.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20040117134753.GA14621@deneb.enyo.de> <42BD9D55-48FC-11D8-AECF-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401171651120.9549@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <1074359645.5368.48.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>
Absolutely. These are the kinds of basic cleanup activities I had in
mind when I requested peer review and suggested a way of breaking up
the
changes.
These are just cleanups that are required before merging to the
mainline.
I still don't think trying to break up all of tree-ssa and it's
individual passes and submitting them makes any sense at all.
Unless we are talking about peer review simply for cleanups, and not
for design issues.
In which case it's a matter of us looking through it ourselves for
cleanups and whatnot we missed and pointing them out to each other.
I'd seriously rather not go about rehashing the design tradeoffs.
Thanks. Diego.