This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2004-01-12T17:28:05Z
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:59:10 -0800
- Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2004-01-12T17:28:05Z
- References: <20040113214847.GM4649@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
>>
>> On Jan 13, 2004, at 12:19, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >Apparently I've fixed the Darwin problem, but not the AIX problem.
>> >It looks like AIX port is doing something wrong, as the allocation is
>> >now as robust as it can be (the function to invent new alias set
>> >allocate or resize the array)
>> >
>> >Sorry for the brekage, nothing of this reproduced on i386.
>>
>> Jan this is not true, look at PR 13665.
> It looks like get_alias_set is leaving set uninitialized in one paths
> out. Does this fix the AIX problem?
> I am testing it and it fix PR 13665 testcase for me.
>
> Bootstrap on i686-pc-gnu-linux in process, OK if it passes?
Yes. It seems clear enough that get_alias_set should never return -2,
independent of larger issues like why subsetting set 0 is invalid.
zw