This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
Gunther Nikl <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:37:35PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Gunther Nikl <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > I just built a native compiler for m68k-amigaos with a cross-compiler
>> > that had the updated patch applied. No objects in gcc/ except m68k.o
>> > differed. Is that a good or bad sign?
>> Can you please find out where exactly they differ?
> I thought that would be obvious: because of your patch (at least I think
> so). I could build a version with the patch applied by an unpatched cross
> compiler to compare the result with objects from the build with the patched
I thought you were talking about stage difference during bootstrap. Is
> Note: the "differed" part in my original mail refered to a compare with an
> unpatched native compiler built with an unpatched cross-compiler. Somehow
> I expected other differences besides m68k.o because this patch is supposed
> to fix bugs. But maybe for my target the bug wasn't triggered by the GCC
> sources with the flags I used for compilation.
The only known miscompilation is in insn-recog.o, and only when building
with -O2 (which implies -funit-at-a-time).
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, email@example.com
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."