This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls

From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:27:52 +0100
Subject: Re: c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls
References: <87u133wadv.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87znct9i4u.fsf@redhat.com> <87llod5a29.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87vfnh9hf2.fsf@redhat.com> <87hdz159dp.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

> It is probably too clever.  I didn't invent this loop; I just pulled
> it out of the middle of duplicate_decls.  I might restructure it
> later, but I have bigger problems right now.

May be it's worth for such code to add an abort at the end?

Laurent

References:
- c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: c-decl.c overhaul (1/3) Refactor duplicate_decls
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]