This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] partial fix for PR 13594 (3.4 regression)

From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com, rsandifo at redhat dot com
Date: 11 Jan 2004 22:05:47 -0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] partial fix for PR 13594 (3.4 regression)
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <orn08zpi4c.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><200401101358.15535.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Jan 10, 2004, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> wrote:

>> Meanwhile, this patch fixes a different bug, so I thought I'd go ahead
>> and post it.  Built and tested (well, almost completed) on
>> i686-pc-linux-gnu and frv-elf.

> Introduced:

Thanks.  It seems that libstdc++ tests don't run for cross compilers,
and my native testing didn't run it, probably because I failed to run
make -k check :-(

Sorry about that.  I see what the problem is.  It seems that strong
using clauses have to be searched first, and only if the search fails
should non-strong using clauses be considered.

I'll try to implement this.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Happy GNU Year!                     oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer

References:
- [PATCH] partial fix for PR 13594 (3.4 regression)
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH] partial fix for PR 13594 (3.4 regression)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]